Oscar Heck: Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock … and out pops the cuckoo … twang!

VHeadline commentarist Oscar Heck writes: So Aleksander Boyd, that Venezuelan traitor, is in Caracas. Interesting. I call him a traitor, because he speaks against the Venezuelan people. He not only hates Chavez, which is fine by me, but he writes in such a way as to deceive the outside world as to the reality of Venezuela, and that means that he is a traitor to him own people.

This is precisely why I began to write against the violent and traitorous Venezuelan opposition over 5 years ago.

One thing is to talk and write against Chavez (everyone has a right to their views), but another thing is to write in deprecation of Venezuela as Aleksander Boyd has been doing for the last 5 years or more on Vcrisis.com.

He is at it again. In an article dated March 8, 2008 and entitled, “Alvaro Uribe keeps outchavezing Hugo Chavez,” he says:

“Many people have asked me in the last few days about the 'looming war' that Venezuela and Ecuador were to wage against Colombia.”

Like so many other people in the mass media, by those few words, he manipulates the brains of innocent readers in such a way that someone who knows nothing of Venezuela will assume that there actually exists a “looming war” between Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador.

The fact is that there is no “looming war,” and Boyd, especially if he is here in Venezuela at this time, knows that.

So why would Boyd-the-traitor make such statements? Could it be that he is “utterly deranged,” as he describes Ken Livingstone (below), the mayor of London?

In my brain, I calculate that if Ken Livingstone were in fact deranged, then he would not have been elected mayor of London. I mean, someone along the way would have noticed that he wasn’t all there and spread the “news” … especially in view that we are talking about a domain (British politics) where dirty laundry is hung out on the streets to be soaked by grey rain, in view of all.

Something about Boyd really doesn’t fit the puzzle … but I think the Ministry of Interior might
just get to fit him into that grand US/opposition scheme, an soon, I hope. He knows what I mean, I’m sure.

He says, “As it turns Colombia not only dealt a mortal blow to FARC's narcoterrorism, but Chilean and Mexican extremist political and student movements, Russian arms dealers and some uranium broker, Venezuela's and Ecuador's presidents and the whole Bolivarian revolution farce have been deeply affected.”

To the innocent and unknowing reader who may not know that Boyd actually publicly called for the use of violence against Chavez and Chavez supporters, one might readily assume that it is only the FARC in Colombia which is associated with the drug trade.

This is not so, the AUC, the mercenary/paramilitary forces who protect the Colombian elite and their business interests, and the Colombian elite (who run the Colombian government) are deeply involved in the drug trade, and more so than the FARC. (You can read about some of this by typing in AUC wiki on Google).

Boyd-the-twisted-mind implies that Chavez is somehow directly associated with the FARC and that the FARC and/or Chavez are involved in the “elicit” uranium and Russian arms business. The fact is that Venezuela now buys some military equipment from Russia to upgrade its equipment because the USA has put a military-contract embargo against Venezuela.

• Then he says something that is utterly nonsensical "and Uribe, I am sure, is sitting on a
  mountain of evidence linking Chavez to all sorts of illegal stuff.”

Most people who are slightly awake and logical know full well that any “evidence” can be entirely fabricated.

Look at 9/11 and Iraq!

And … “Ken Livingstone and some rather fanatic English MPs support, but we all know how
utterly deranged these other people are, don't we?”

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock … and out pops the cuckoo … twang.

Oscar Heck
oscarheck111@yahoo.com