Now that's quite a mouthful as well as being quite an assertion for anyone to make, but...
It rather reflects the ... shall we say ... "paranoia" raised in some sectors of the community over the perception that Venezuela's duly-elected leader is perhaps going too far with the projected Telecommunications Law which the Caracas daily newspaper TAL CUAL claims will leave Venezuelans 'incommunicado' by suspending all forms of "broadcasting, emission or reception of signals, signs, written matter, images, sounds or information of any kind via cable."
- President Chavez, of course, claims the conjecture to be more of the same old, same old! "Constant lies and distortions by the private media in a desperate campaign; a conspiracy plan that simply seeks to destabilize the country and make Venezuela seem like a dictatorship!"
The Miami Herald -- never backward in coming forward to howl abuse at anything Chavez does -- went so far on August 25 to headline "Chavez tightens grip on media" and to claim that the new law is a "blackout law" on freedom of expression, giving absolute power to the executive branch to order the blackout of information for "reasons of national security" which need never be explained; that Chavez will effectively be able to control information at his discretion!"
Telecommunications (Conatel) Minister, Socorro Hernandez, has denied that the currently draft-law will allow increased state control or media sanctions ... but the proof is in the pudding and will certainly be the subject of rigorous discussion when it finally arrives before the National Assembly (Congress) to approve or disapprove. Under the draft terms President Chavez will have exclusive authority to order the suspension of "any type of transmission, emission or reception of signals, signs, writings, images, sounds or information of any nature."
Excuse me! But that sure looks like one hell of a lot of authority to rest on the whim of an individual, especially since the individual concerned is already suspected (admittedly quite irrationally) of being an 'authoritarian strongman, dictator' by large sections of the unwitting international media that relies on the Fox News version of world affairs for what serves as political insight for the neo-conservative proletariat of Anytown USA.
Admittedly there is sound reason for some degree of control over the more lunatic utterings that pollute the Internet, but do the Venezuelan legislators who will ultimately decide IF President Chavez should be allowed to wield the massive sledgehammer ... do they really really think its the best route to take?
The answer to THAT must necessarily wait until the draft is discussed in plenary session in the Venezuelan Congress. Hopefully some degree of sensibility will be at the legislators' disposal before they commit hara-kiri and commit Venezuela's democratic to the grave.
The problem is that everyone with even only half an ounce of brain power who witnesses what is happening in Venezuela, will see that even if the Venezuelan government is rightly or wrongly feeling the intense sting of international critique, its track record of the last ten years is NOT conducive to any naive belief that everything will turn out in the end.
Regrettably, recent years have seen a decline in what is generally accepted as press freedoms in Venezuela although it is not necessarily the pro-Chavez government that is uniquely to blame.
...and it isn't helped any by ministry hacks who're so afraid of the hell that will immediately descend from them from a great height IF they speak out of turn and/or in-absentio Ambassadors and other assorted government flunkeys who throw adolescent tantrums when faced with having to give explanations for various administration misdeeds -- like unruly teenagers barricaded in their bedrooms believing they don't have to (ultimately) come out and face the music...
It is an accepted fact that the privately-owned media in Venezuela is driven by an intense hatred of Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias. You need only read massive sections of the (Spanish-language) Venezuelan national and provincial media each day to understand that the political opposition is in control of most of the broadsheets as well as the more popular radio and television stations.
On the other hand you need only read the plethora of pro-government and/or government-owned media to understand that if there is any balance to be found in Venezuelan reporting, it is to be found in a non-existent vacuum somewhere between extreme Right and extreme Left with nary an opportunity for objectivity, which appears to be an anathema to Venezuelan journalists in general.
You're either pro- or anti-Chavez and, it appears, that that is the way it will remain for quite a long time to come.
Unless, of course, Chavez gets the executive power to stomp all over the opposition media if and when it dares to raise a critical voice under any future Orwellian state of emergency that he may concoct or have thrust upon him.
Are we exaggerating? Quite simply NO!
For during the USA-backed attempt by 'Dictator-for-a-Day' Pedro Carmona Estanga to impose a dictatorship in April 2002, the selfsame opposition media ganged together to install their own media news blackout when it became apparent that Carmona Estanga's ambition to sell Venezuela up the river to Washington DC had failed!
So is the Telecommunications draft-law simply an attempt to wreak revenge on the opposition for past misdeeds? One would certainly be led to believe so if you fell for the Venezuelan opposition's constant bleating over the fate of Radio Caracas TV (RCTV) which simply had its free-to-air broadcast license denied when it came up for renewal just over a year ago! Yes, all hell broke loose with opposition and USA criticism that it was 'censorship in disguise' but considering the incredibly abusive track record of RCTV in breaking just about every broadcasting rule in the book, it was scarcely any surprise that the government took the limited action of telling them to take a hike.
Unfortunately the channel replacement by TVes is a half-baked shadow of any shade of professionalism and is basically an echo of already pro-Chavez over laden hype like state-owned Venezolana de Television (VTV) which makes a very, very, very poor effort to emulate the BBC or NPR.
With 'I am God' government officials pre-disposed to snarl their own abuse to the opposition media, little realizing that they are essentially digging their own media graves, the ever-widening chasm between opposition and pro-Chavez reporting is getting to oceanic proportions ahead of November 23 local and regional elections which do NOT bode well for President Chavez' (not-so-)United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) which could possibly meet its own Armagheddon come November 24.
Rather, indeed, President Hugo Chavez Frias and his publicists should get down from their lofty white horses and walk awhile with what they perceive to be their most abject enemies in the Washington Post, New York Times, Houston Chronicle and even VHeadline Venezuela.
While they cower in their ivory towers in Miraflores or on downtown Avenida Universidad throwing hissy-fits, they will only cross-fertilize their own paranoia and fright of one-to-one communication ... they leave themselves with NO opportunity to do other than to preach to the already converted, singing from the same hymn-sheet with little or no prospect of getting potential converts around the world to sing the same song.
There's little point in yelling the 'Glad Hosannas' at the top of their voices on the home front, and to the distraction of incredulous men and women in the streets of Anytown USA ... or Anywhere Else ... if those who are temporarily tuned-in to "the message" are treated like so much feces to be flushed down the pan under some concept that the Bolivarian Revolution is the anti-cancer drug to save the world from eternal neo-Con damnation.
It simply doesn't work that way!
And the sooner Venezuela's Minister of Communications & Information (MinCI) Andres Izarra and his boss, President Chavez, realize the folly of their media ways, the better it will be for them to have the various idiots, locos and disinformers understand that Venezuelan democracy means transparency and openness in information and NOT the folly of April 2002 when Carmona Estanga. thankfully, failed to pull down the shutters on Venezuela courtesy of the Washington Beltway bullies and the White House cabal.
BUT they must NOT do it by imposing censorship in any shape or form ... that is the ultimate annihilation of everything that President Hugo Chavez Frias stood for when he was democratically elected to be President of the Republic of Venezuela ... and so it should remain!
Roy S. Carson
vheadline@gmail.com
____________________________________
Venezuela is facing the most difficult period of its history with honest reporters crippled by sectarianism on top of rampant corruption within the administration and beyond, aided and abetted by criminal forces in the US and Spanish governments which cannot accept the sovereignty of the Venezuelan people to decide over their own future.
HELP US TO KEEP BRINGING YOU THE TRUTH
http://tinyurl.com/n4fg
No comments:
Post a Comment