O'Grady described the European action as taking the MRTA off the list, even though it was never on it and called the decision 'maddening.' She added that it was instructive since it shows how 'terrorists can advance their cause with the help of nongovernmental organizations' that are often funded by 'foreign government and philanthropists.'
She went on to talk about Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's president, and the activities of the Bolivarian Movement he funds and its possible connections to terrorism. She then circled back to APRODEH, noting that it received funding from George Soros's Open Society and the U.S. Government. She concluded that the work of foreign-funded NGOs like APRODEH 'in the interest of terrorist organizations warrants urgent attention.' The article helpfully included a picture of Soros just to make the connection clear.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Mary O'Grady of WSJ is educated enough to know that the NED and other U.S. Government agencies are funding terrorists because it is part of their agenda.
ReplyDeleteI would not be a bit surprised to hear that even the WSJ is part of the group. Any part of news media that supports the Bush regime has to be part of the problem, because they are certainly not part of the solution.
But of course Mary O'Grady already knows this, and will not speak against her paymasters, or will she?