This of course is a loaded question by Manuel Rosales, because he is accepting the Colombian tapes and their trumped up as God�s truth. Where is there any proof that these tapes ever belonged to the FARC leader Raul Reyes? Are we to take the word of a government that is in the pay of the U.S.? Secondly, can we unquestionably accept the endorsement of those tapes as being authentic just on the say-so of INTERPOL? IINTERPOL has been well known to cooperate with the U.S. government before, so why should we expect them to change that policy. The INTERPOL endorsement of those illegally captured computer files smacks of open collusion between them and the Colombian and U.S. governments.
Was INTERPOL ever given the evidence of the so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction that President Saddam Hussein of Iraq supposedly possessed by the Bush regime to authenticate, and if so why not? Because it seems to be in the business of authentication, and that would have avoided the Iraqi invasion and war that followed, if it had been proven false.
I guess that INTERPOL only does what the BUSH regime orders it to do.
- Thus INTERPOL itself is suspect in having shady dealings.
- And if we consider that point then INTERPOL could not be trusted.
Can Rosales himself be party to the Colombian government�s anti-Chavez policies?
If so then Manuel Rosales cannot be trusted and should not be asking any questions of Chavez, in the first place.
Of course we have known all along that Venezuelan-Vichyite Manuel Rosales is not working for the good of Venezuela, but for the very U.S. government, which has intentions on Venezuela�s oilfields.
Case closed.
Kenneth T. Tellis
kenttellis@rogers.com
No comments:
Post a Comment